When we go into the field to observe people performing tasks, we remain outside observers, asking questions and taking notes, but not getting involved in their activities ourselves.Īnthropologists and sociologists often practice participant observation, in which they join a group as a participating member to get a first-hand perspective of the group and their activities. But we haven’t adopted one signature method of anthropology: participant observation. Also the researcher can use their own experiences within the group which provides “first hand insights” into why people behave as they do.ĭuring participant observation there are no prejudges issues or events, to the level of validity is high.In the field of UX design research, we’ve borrowed and adapted many research methods from anthropology to enable us to better understand people and their needs. Because of the fact that people are observed in their natural environment which allows the researched a depth of insight into behaviour that they can usually not gage from simply using surveys. Aside from this with overt participant observation the changes of behaviour cannot be accounted for.Īlthough participant observation isn’t known for its reliability, the data gained is usually very valid and therefore often impressive. This is because they are virtually impossible to repeat and the data they produce is only the opinion of one observer, another may interpret it completely differently. Participant observation is not known as one of the most reliable types of research methods. He saw two groups form within them “corner boys” and “college boys”.ĭespite adopting the overt participant observation role, Whyte came to view himself as “one of the gang” during the three-and-half years he spent living in the neighbourhood and researching the society. ![]() Whyte was observing how the local gangs were formed and organized. The neighbourhood had high levels of crime and was considered to be dangerous: Whyte was protected by his friendship with a local “Doc”. This could have a negative impact on the results gained from the research. This type has advantages in that the group is co-operative with the researcher, but disadvantages in that those being studied may suffer from the Hawthorne affect (where people act differently when they know they’re being watched). The group is thought to be giving their position. They will know details of the study for example the purpose of the study and how long it will last. Overt: Involves the researcher being open with the group who they are studying, the society is aware that they are being researched, because the one researching them has informed them. There are two types of participant observation Overt and Covert. Also the researcher must have a high level of skill in order to be capable of carrying out the research. ![]() The general limitations of participant observation are the fact that there is a high level of participation required which can cost a lot and take up a lot of time. This is because their partial or full membership in the community they are studying allows a different kind of access than to a researcher who was considered a full “outsider”. Sociologists who themselves have certain aspects of the community they are studying tend to take part in these research methods. It takes a long period of time between several months and several years. It tends to gain qualitative research but often also includes quantitative dimensions. There are a range of methods by which researchers can study their subjects all of which are included in the overall heading of “participant observation”, these include: interviews, direct observation, participation, collective discussions, analyses of personal documents, self-analysis and analysis of life histories. The aim of participant observations is to understand the subject’s world from their point of view, it is sometimes referred to as a form of “subjective” sociology. Some methods like surveys stress the important of not becoming “personally involved”. ![]() It is a research method which does not maintain personal and social distance between the researcher and people who are being studying. It could be described as “putting yourself in their shoes”. The person who is carrying out the research enters the culture of those they’re studying and experiences events and experiences in the way in which the respondents experiences them. Participant observation is a research method which involves “getting to know” the people or culture of those who are being observed and studied as the researcher immerses themselves in culture they’re observing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |